<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excel Defunct Defaults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/index.php/excel-defunct-defaults/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/index.php/excel-defunct-defaults/</link>
	<description>A DataPig Technologies Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/index.php/excel-defunct-defaults/comment-page-1/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-3395</guid>
		<description>How odd that TRUE should be 1, rather than -1?

I often use the TRUE argument with a VLOOKUP to bracket calculated items - e.g. when ageing something, then group into an appropriate category. Looks like Match would do the same thing for me - is either appreciably quicker?

teylyn - I think that&#039;s rather a brutal approach!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How odd that TRUE should be 1, rather than -1?</p>
<p>I often use the TRUE argument with a VLOOKUP to bracket calculated items &#8211; e.g. when ageing something, then group into an appropriate category. Looks like Match would do the same thing for me &#8211; is either appreciably quicker?</p>
<p>teylyn &#8211; I think that&#8217;s rather a brutal approach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teylyn</title>
		<link>http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/index.php/excel-defunct-defaults/comment-page-1/#comment-3372</link>
		<dc:creator>teylyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-3372</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s actually a good thing that the MATCH and VLOOKUP last argument defaults to 1. That avoids a lot of error messages for people who don&#039;t know how to use the functions properly. Leaving out the last argument will always provide them with a value, and if they don&#039;t cotton on to the fact that it may actually not be the correct result, well, that&#039;s what they deserve. :-)  It helps conquer the learning curve if you hit your toes hard a few times with that situation.

I actually prefer writing out the FALSE or TRUE in VLOOKUP, rather than using 1 or 0. Although I have to type a few more characters, it&#039;s not such a big deal, and with the parameter suggestions that Excel 2007 and later pops up, it&#039;s just a &quot;down arrow&quot; and &quot;tab&quot; to complete, so only one key stroke more than typing a 1 or a 0.

In a long and nested formula I appreciate all the help I can get when I need to go back and review or rework it, so if I see a FALSE or TRUE jump out at me from a VLOOKUP, I much more readily recognise what the VLOOKUP is supposed to be doing. If it were 0 or 1, I might need to look a bit harder to see what the formula does. 

Then again, I always use 0 or 1, not TRUE or FALSE with MATCH. 

But I NEVER, EVER omit it. 

There should be an Option Explicit for functions that ensures that all parameters are spelled out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s actually a good thing that the MATCH and VLOOKUP last argument defaults to 1. That avoids a lot of error messages for people who don&#8217;t know how to use the functions properly. Leaving out the last argument will always provide them with a value, and if they don&#8217;t cotton on to the fact that it may actually not be the correct result, well, that&#8217;s what they deserve. <img src='http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   It helps conquer the learning curve if you hit your toes hard a few times with that situation.</p>
<p>I actually prefer writing out the FALSE or TRUE in VLOOKUP, rather than using 1 or 0. Although I have to type a few more characters, it&#8217;s not such a big deal, and with the parameter suggestions that Excel 2007 and later pops up, it&#8217;s just a &#8220;down arrow&#8221; and &#8220;tab&#8221; to complete, so only one key stroke more than typing a 1 or a 0.</p>
<p>In a long and nested formula I appreciate all the help I can get when I need to go back and review or rework it, so if I see a FALSE or TRUE jump out at me from a VLOOKUP, I much more readily recognise what the VLOOKUP is supposed to be doing. If it were 0 or 1, I might need to look a bit harder to see what the formula does. </p>
<p>Then again, I always use 0 or 1, not TRUE or FALSE with MATCH. </p>
<p>But I NEVER, EVER omit it. </p>
<p>There should be an Option Explicit for functions that ensures that all parameters are spelled out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/index.php/excel-defunct-defaults/comment-page-1/#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. I find it also very interesting that always the &quot;1&quot; is the default value (in the MATCH and VLOOKUP functions described above).

Maybe it&#039;s easier to program our lovely spreadsheet application with 1 as a default option for &quot;everything&quot; ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I find it also very interesting that always the &#8220;1&#8243; is the default value (in the MATCH and VLOOKUP functions described above).</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s easier to program our lovely spreadsheet application with 1 as a default option for &#8220;everything&#8221; <img src='http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/index.php/excel-defunct-defaults/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>Very interesting stuff. Thanks alot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting stuff. Thanks alot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim cone</title>
		<link>http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/index.php/excel-defunct-defaults/comment-page-1/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>jim cone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datapigtechnologies.com/blog/?p=1745#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>When using match in VBA...
if the list is sorted, then a match type of 1 or (-1) is much faster.  It can even be faster when sorting the list, matching and then resorting the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When using match in VBA&#8230;<br />
if the list is sorted, then a match type of 1 or (-1) is much faster.  It can even be faster when sorting the list, matching and then resorting the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

